DeepSeek Flash Latest is $0.02 cheaper per 1M input tokens (14.3% lower; 1.17x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewDeepSeek Flash Latest vs Muse Glimmer 30B (batch)
Pick DeepSeek Flash Latest when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick DeepSeek Flash Latest when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek Flash Latest is estimated at $0.45 vs $0.55 for Muse Glimmer 30B (batch), saving $0.1 (18.2% lower).
Cost-first pickDeepSeek Flash Latest
Context-first pickDeepSeek Flash Latest
Sample savings$0.118.2%
10x traffic gap$1
DeepSeek Flash Latest is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $1. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
DeepSeek Flash Latest stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | DeepSeek Flash Latest | Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | DeepSeek Flash Latest | $1.05 | $1.25 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | DeepSeek Flash Latest | $0.75 | $0.93 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | DeepSeek Flash Latest | $3.15 | $3.92 |
DeepSeek Flash Latest is $0.15 cheaper per 1M output tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
DeepSeek Flash Latest has 917.5K more context (8x larger).
DeepSeek Flash Latest is $0.1 cheaper on the standard workload (18.2% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
DeepSeek Flash Latest has the lower input price; DeepSeek Flash Latest has the lower output price; DeepSeek Flash Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, DeepSeek Flash Latest is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.45 for DeepSeek Flash Latest and $0.55 for Muse Glimmer 30B (batch).
Choose DeepSeek Flash Latest when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek Flash Latest is estimated at $0.45 vs $0.55 for Muse Glimmer 30B (batch), saving $0.1 (18.2% lower).
- DeepSeek Flash Latest is $0.1 cheaper on the standard workload (18.2% lower).
- DeepSeek Flash Latest is $0.02 cheaper per 1M input tokens (14.3% lower; 1.17x difference).
- DeepSeek Flash Latest is $0.15 cheaper per 1M output tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
- DeepSeek Flash Latest has 917.5K more context (8x larger).
| Feature | NewDeepSeek Flash Latest (DeepSeek) | Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) (Meta) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.15 | $0.175 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.6 | $0.75 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.45 | $0.55 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 131.07K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | DeepSeek Flash Latest | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek Flash Latest is estimated at $0.45 vs $0.55 for Muse Glimmer 30B (batch), saving $0.1 (18.2% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | DeepSeek Flash Latest | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | DeepSeek Flash Latest | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | DeepSeek Flash Latest | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) can replace DeepSeek Flash Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest can replace DeepSeek Flash Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 can replace DeepSeek Flash Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.12.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 can replace DeepSeek Flash Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.17.
- GLM 5.3 Flash offers 1.31M context with $0.4 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.12 sample workload cost.
- GLM Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.09 sample workload cost.
- GPT-5.6 Luna · OpenAI · #1
- Hy4 preview · Tencent · #2
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #3
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsDeepSeek catalog
Review all tracked DeepSeek models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open DeepSeek modelsMeta catalog
Check other Meta models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Meta modelsThis model always redirects to the latest model in the DeepSeek Flash family.
Muse Glimmer 30B is a dense, open-weight multimodal model from Meta Superintelligence Labs, distilled from Muse Spark and optimized for autonomous agents on consumer hardware. It is suited for long-horizon...