Qwen3.5-27B is $0.05 cheaper per 1M input tokens (22% lower; 1.28x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Seed-2.0-Lite vs Qwen3.5-27B
Pick Qwen3.5-27B when budget is the priority.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Qwen3.5-27B when budget is the priority.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.5-27B is estimated at $0.98 vs $1.25 for Seed-2.0-Lite, saving $0.27 (22% lower).
Cost-first pickQwen3.5-27B
Context-first pickBoth models
Sample savings$0.2722%
10x traffic gap$2.75
The reported context window is tied, so cost and provider fit carry more weight. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $2.75. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Qwen3.5-27B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Seed-2.0-Lite | Qwen3.5-27B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Qwen3.5-27B | $2.25 | $1.75 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Qwen3.5-27B | $2.25 | $1.76 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Qwen3.5-27B | $10.25 | $8 |
Qwen3.5-27B is $0.44 cheaper per 1M output tokens (22% lower; 1.28x difference).
Both models report the same context window at 262.14K tokens.
Qwen3.5-27B is $0.27 cheaper on the standard workload (22% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Qwen3.5-27B has the lower input price; Qwen3.5-27B has the lower output price; both models report the same context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Qwen3.5-27B is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $1.25 for Seed-2.0-Lite and $0.98 for Qwen3.5-27B.
Choose Seed-2.0-Lite when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
Choose Qwen3.5-27B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.5-27B is estimated at $0.98 vs $1.25 for Seed-2.0-Lite, saving $0.27 (22% lower).
- Qwen3.5-27B is $0.27 cheaper on the standard workload (22% lower).
- Qwen3.5-27B is $0.05 cheaper per 1M input tokens (22% lower; 1.28x difference).
- Qwen3.5-27B is $0.44 cheaper per 1M output tokens (22% lower; 1.28x difference).
- Both models report the same context window at 262.14K tokens.
| Feature | Seed-2.0-Lite (ByteDance Seed) | Qwen3.5-27B (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.25 | $0.195 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $2 | $1.56 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $1.25 | $0.98 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 262.14K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Qwen3.5-27B | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.5-27B is estimated at $0.98 vs $1.25 for Seed-2.0-Lite, saving $0.27 (22% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Qwen3.5-27B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Qwen3.5-27B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Tie | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Seed 1.6 Flash can replace Seed-2.0-Lite when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.22.
- Seed-2.0-Mini can replace Seed-2.0-Lite when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.3.
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct (free) can replace Qwen3.5-27B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (free) can replace Qwen3.5-27B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro offers 1.05M context with $0.87 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsByteDance Seed catalog
Review all tracked ByteDance Seed models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open ByteDance Seed modelsQwen catalog
Check other Qwen models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Qwen modelsSeed-2.0-Lite is a versatile, cost‑efficient enterprise workhorse that delivers strong multimodal and agent capabilities while offering noticeably lower latency, making it a practical default choice for most production workloads across...
The Qwen3.5 27B native vision-language Dense model incorporates a linear attention mechanism, delivering fast response times while balancing inference speed and performance. Its overall capabilities are comparable to those of...