API cost decision in 10 seconds

Qianfan-OCR-Fast vs Reka Edge

Pick Reka Edge for lower cost; pick Qianfan-OCR-Fast only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Reka Edge for lower cost; pick Qianfan-OCR-Fast only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Reka Edge is estimated at $0.15 vs $2.08 for Qianfan-OCR-Fast, saving $1.94 (92.8% lower).

Cost-first pickReka Edge
Context-first pickQianfan-OCR-Fast
Sample savings$1.9492.8%
10x traffic gap$19.35

Qianfan-OCR-Fast has more context, but Reka Edge saves $1.94 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $19.35. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Reka Edge stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickQianfan-OCR-FastReka Edge
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputReka Edge$4.81$0.55
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputReka Edge$3.49$0.2
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputReka Edge$14.73$0.6
Cheaper input Reka Edge $0.68 vs $0.1 / 1M

Reka Edge is $0.58 cheaper per 1M input tokens (85.3% lower; 6.8x difference).

Cheaper output Reka Edge $2.81 vs $0.1 / 1M

Reka Edge is $2.71 cheaper per 1M output tokens (96.4% lower; 28.1x difference).

Larger context Qianfan-OCR-Fast 65.54K vs 16.38K

Qianfan-OCR-Fast has 49.15K more context (4x larger).

Sample workload Reka Edge $2.08 vs $0.15

Reka Edge is $1.94 cheaper on the standard workload (92.8% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Qianfan-OCR-Fast Calculating… Estimated API cost
Reka Edge Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Reka Edge has the lower input price; Reka Edge has the lower output price; Qianfan-OCR-Fast offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Reka Edge is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $2.08 for Qianfan-OCR-Fast and $0.15 for Reka Edge.

Best Fit

Choose Qianfan-OCR-Fast when you care most about larger context window.

Choose Reka Edge when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Reka Edge is estimated at $0.15 vs $2.08 for Qianfan-OCR-Fast, saving $1.94 (92.8% lower).
  • Reka Edge is $1.94 cheaper on the standard workload (92.8% lower).
  • Reka Edge is $0.58 cheaper per 1M input tokens (85.3% lower; 6.8x difference).
  • Reka Edge is $2.71 cheaper per 1M output tokens (96.4% lower; 28.1x difference).
  • Qianfan-OCR-Fast has 49.15K more context (4x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureQianfan-OCR-Fast
(Baidu)
Reka Edge
(rekaai)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$0.68$0.1
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$2.81$0.1
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$2.08$0.15
Context Window65.54K16.38K
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionReka EdgeOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Reka Edge is estimated at $0.15 vs $2.08 for Qianfan-OCR-Fast, saving $1.94 (92.8% lower).
High-volume input processingReka EdgeLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsReka EdgeLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workQianfan-OCR-FastA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking can replace Qianfan-OCR-Fast when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.21.
  • ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B can replace Qianfan-OCR-Fast when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.21.
  • ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B can replace Qianfan-OCR-Fast when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.42.
  • ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B can replace Qianfan-OCR-Fast when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.83.
Larger context near this budget
  • Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
  • Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
  • Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Baidu catalog

Review all tracked Baidu models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Baidu models

rekaai catalog

Check other rekaai models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open rekaai models
Qianfan-OCR-Fast

Qianfan-OCR-Fast is a domain-specific multimodal large model purpose-built for OCR. By leveraging specialized OCR training data while preserving versatile multimodal intelligence, it provides a powerful performance upgrade over Qianfan-OCR.

Reka Edge

Reka Edge is an extremely efficient 7B multimodal vision-language model that accepts image/video+text inputs and generates text outputs. This model is optimized specifically to deliver industry-leading performance in image understanding,...