Rnj 1 Instruct is $0.53 cheaper per 1M input tokens (77.9% lower; 4.53x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Qianfan-OCR-Fast vs Rnj 1 Instruct
Pick Rnj 1 Instruct for lower cost; pick Qianfan-OCR-Fast only if the larger context window matters more.
Budget verdict
Pick Rnj 1 Instruct for lower cost; pick Qianfan-OCR-Fast only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Rnj 1 Instruct is estimated at $0.22 vs $2.08 for Qianfan-OCR-Fast, saving $1.86 (89.2% lower).
Qianfan-OCR-Fast has more context, but Rnj 1 Instruct saves $1.86 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $18.6. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Rnj 1 Instruct stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Qianfan-OCR-Fast | Rnj 1 Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Rnj 1 Instruct | $4.81 | $0.82 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Rnj 1 Instruct | $3.49 | $0.3 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Rnj 1 Instruct | $14.73 | $0.9 |
Rnj 1 Instruct is $2.66 cheaper per 1M output tokens (94.7% lower; 18.7x difference).
Qianfan-OCR-Fast has 32.77K more context (2x larger).
Rnj 1 Instruct is $1.86 cheaper on the standard workload (89.2% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Rnj 1 Instruct has the lower input price; Rnj 1 Instruct has the lower output price; Qianfan-OCR-Fast offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Rnj 1 Instruct is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $2.08 for Qianfan-OCR-Fast and $0.22 for Rnj 1 Instruct.
Choose Qianfan-OCR-Fast when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Rnj 1 Instruct when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Rnj 1 Instruct is estimated at $0.22 vs $2.08 for Qianfan-OCR-Fast, saving $1.86 (89.2% lower).
- Rnj 1 Instruct is $1.86 cheaper on the standard workload (89.2% lower).
- Rnj 1 Instruct is $0.53 cheaper per 1M input tokens (77.9% lower; 4.53x difference).
- Rnj 1 Instruct is $2.66 cheaper per 1M output tokens (94.7% lower; 18.7x difference).
- Qianfan-OCR-Fast has 32.77K more context (2x larger).
| Feature | Qianfan-OCR-Fast (Baidu) | Rnj 1 Instruct (EssentialAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.68 | $0.15 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $2.81 | $0.15 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $2.08 | $0.22 |
| Context Window | 65.54K | 32.77K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Rnj 1 Instruct | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Rnj 1 Instruct is estimated at $0.22 vs $2.08 for Qianfan-OCR-Fast, saving $1.86 (89.2% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Rnj 1 Instruct | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Rnj 1 Instruct | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Qianfan-OCR-Fast | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking can replace Qianfan-OCR-Fast when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.21.
- ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B can replace Qianfan-OCR-Fast when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.21.
- ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B can replace Qianfan-OCR-Fast when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.42.
- ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B can replace Qianfan-OCR-Fast when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.83.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsBaidu catalog
Review all tracked Baidu models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Baidu modelsEssentialAI catalog
Check other EssentialAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open EssentialAI modelsQianfan-OCR-Fast is a domain-specific multimodal large model purpose-built for OCR. By leveraging specialized OCR training data while preserving versatile multimodal intelligence, it provides a powerful performance upgrade over Qianfan-OCR.
Rnj-1 is an 8B-parameter, dense, open-weight model family developed by Essential AI and trained from scratch with a focus on programming, math, and scientific reasoning. The model demonstrates strong performance...