CoBuddy (free) is free for input tokens while GPT Chat Latest costs $5 per 1M tokens.
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewCoBuddy (free) vs NewGPT Chat Latest
Pick CoBuddy (free) for lower cost; pick GPT Chat Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
Pricing data updated:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick CoBuddy (free) for lower cost; pick GPT Chat Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, CoBuddy (free) is estimated at $0 vs $20 for GPT Chat Latest, saving $20 (100% lower).
Cost-first pickCoBuddy (free)
Context-first pickGPT Chat Latest
Sample savings$20100%
10x traffic gap$200
GPT Chat Latest has more context, but CoBuddy (free) saves $20 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $200. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
CoBuddy (free) stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | CoBuddy (free) | GPT Chat Latest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | CoBuddy (free) | $0 | $40 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | CoBuddy (free) | $0 | $35 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | CoBuddy (free) | $0 | $155 |
CoBuddy (free) is free for output tokens while GPT Chat Latest costs $30 per 1M tokens.
GPT Chat Latest has 268.93K more context (3.05x larger).
CoBuddy (free) is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $20.
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
CoBuddy (free) has the lower input price; CoBuddy (free) has the lower output price; GPT Chat Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, CoBuddy (free) is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0 for CoBuddy (free) and $20 for GPT Chat Latest.
Choose CoBuddy (free) when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose GPT Chat Latest when you care most about larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, CoBuddy (free) is estimated at $0 vs $20 for GPT Chat Latest, saving $20 (100% lower).
- CoBuddy (free) is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $20.
- CoBuddy (free) is free for input tokens while GPT Chat Latest costs $5 per 1M tokens.
- CoBuddy (free) is free for output tokens while GPT Chat Latest costs $30 per 1M tokens.
- GPT Chat Latest has 268.93K more context (3.05x larger).
| Feature | NewCoBuddy (free) (Baidu Qianfan) | NewGPT Chat Latest (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0 | $5 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0 | $30 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0 | $20 |
| Context Window | 131.07K | 400K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | CoBuddy (free) | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, CoBuddy (free) is estimated at $0 vs $20 for GPT Chat Latest, saving $20 (100% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | CoBuddy (free) | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | CoBuddy (free) | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | GPT Chat Latest | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT Chat Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT Chat Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT Chat Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- gpt-oss-120b can replace GPT Chat Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- OpenAI GPT Latest offers 1.05M context with $20 sample workload cost.
- No popular competitor is currently available.
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsBaidu Qianfan catalog
Review all tracked Baidu Qianfan models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Baidu Qianfan modelsOpenAI catalog
Check other OpenAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open OpenAI modelsCoBuddy is a code generation model from Baidu, optimized for coding tasks and AI Agent workflows. It features high inference throughput and low end-to-end latency, with native support for tool...
GPT Chat Latest points to OpenAI's stable API alias `chat-latest` that always resolves to the latest Instant chat model used in ChatGPT. As OpenAI rolls out new Instant model updates...