GPT-5.2 is $1.25 cheaper per 1M input tokens (41.7% lower; 1.71x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest vs GPT-5.2
Pick GPT-5.2 for lower cost; pick Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
Pricing data updated:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick GPT-5.2 for lower cost; pick Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.2 is estimated at $8.75 vs $10.5 for Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest, saving $1.75 (16.7% lower).
Cost-first pickGPT-5.2
Context-first pickAnthropic Claude Sonnet Latest
Sample savings$1.7516.7%
10x traffic gap$17.5
Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest has more context, but GPT-5.2 saves $1.75 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $17.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
GPT-5.2 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | GPT-5.2 | $22.5 | $15.75 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | GPT-5.2 | $18 | $15.75 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | GPT-5.2 | $78 | $71.75 |
GPT-5.2 is $1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (6.7% lower; 1.07x difference).
Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest has 600K more context (2.5x larger).
GPT-5.2 is $1.75 cheaper on the standard workload (16.7% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
GPT-5.2 has the lower input price; GPT-5.2 has the lower output price; Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GPT-5.2 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $10.5 for Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest and $8.75 for GPT-5.2.
Choose Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest when you care most about larger context window.
Choose GPT-5.2 when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.2 is estimated at $8.75 vs $10.5 for Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest, saving $1.75 (16.7% lower).
- GPT-5.2 is $1.75 cheaper on the standard workload (16.7% lower).
- GPT-5.2 is $1.25 cheaper per 1M input tokens (41.7% lower; 1.71x difference).
- GPT-5.2 is $1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (6.7% lower; 1.07x difference).
- Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest has 600K more context (2.5x larger).
| Feature | Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest (Anthropic) | GPT-5.2 (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $3 | $1.75 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $15 | $14 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $10.5 | $8.75 |
| Context Window | 1M | 400K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | GPT-5.2 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.2 is estimated at $8.75 vs $10.5 for Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest, saving $1.75 (16.7% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | GPT-5.2 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | GPT-5.2 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Claude 3 Haiku can replace Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.88.
- Claude 3.5 Haiku can replace Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $2.8.
- Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest can replace Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.
- Claude Haiku 4.5 can replace Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- GPT-5.4 offers 1.05M context with $10 sample workload cost.
- No popular competitor is currently available.
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsAnthropic catalog
Review all tracked Anthropic models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Anthropic modelsOpenAI catalog
Check other OpenAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open OpenAI modelsThis model always redirects to the latest model in the Anthropic Claude Sonnet family.
GPT-5.2 is the latest frontier-grade model in the GPT-5 series, offering stronger agentic and long context perfomance compared to GPT-5.1. It uses adaptive reasoning to allocate computation dynamically, responding quickly...