Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is $2.74 cheaper per 1M input tokens (91.3% lower; 11.5x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Claude Sonnet 4 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B for lower cost; pick Claude Sonnet 4 only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B for lower cost; pick Claude Sonnet 4 only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is estimated at $1.3 vs $10.5 for Claude Sonnet 4, saving $9.2 (87.6% lower).
Cost-first pickQwen3.5-122B-A10B
Context-first pickClaude Sonnet 4
Sample savings$9.287.6%
10x traffic gap$92
Claude Sonnet 4 has more context, but Qwen3.5-122B-A10B saves $9.2 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $92. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Claude Sonnet 4 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | $22.5 | $2.34 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | $18 | $2.34 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | $78 | $10.66 |
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is $12.92 cheaper per 1M output tokens (86.1% lower; 7.21x difference).
Claude Sonnet 4 has 737.86K more context (3.81x larger).
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is $9.2 cheaper on the standard workload (87.6% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the lower input price; Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the lower output price; Claude Sonnet 4 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $10.5 for Claude Sonnet 4 and $1.3 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.
Choose Claude Sonnet 4 when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Qwen3.5-122B-A10B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is estimated at $1.3 vs $10.5 for Claude Sonnet 4, saving $9.2 (87.6% lower).
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is $9.2 cheaper on the standard workload (87.6% lower).
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is $2.74 cheaper per 1M input tokens (91.3% lower; 11.5x difference).
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is $12.92 cheaper per 1M output tokens (86.1% lower; 7.21x difference).
- Claude Sonnet 4 has 737.86K more context (3.81x larger).
| Feature | Claude Sonnet 4 (Anthropic) | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $3 | $0.26 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $15 | $2.08 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $10.5 | $1.3 |
| Context Window | 1M | 262.14K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #60 | #142 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is estimated at $1.3 vs $10.5 for Claude Sonnet 4, saving $9.2 (87.6% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Claude Sonnet 4 | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Claude 3 Haiku can replace Claude Sonnet 4 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.88.
- Claude 3.5 Haiku can replace Claude Sonnet 4 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $2.8.
- Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest can replace Claude Sonnet 4 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.
- Claude Haiku 4.5 can replace Claude Sonnet 4 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
- GPT-5.4 offers 1.05M context with $10 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsAnthropic catalog
Review all tracked Anthropic models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Anthropic modelsQwen catalog
Check other Qwen models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Qwen modelsClaude Sonnet 4 significantly enhances the capabilities of its predecessor, Sonnet 3.7, excelling in both coding and reasoning tasks with improved precision and controllability. Achieving state-of-the-art performance on SWE-bench (72.7%),...
The Qwen3.5 122B-A10B native vision-language model is built on a hybrid architecture that integrates a linear attention mechanism with a sparse mixture-of-experts model, achieving higher inference efficiency. In terms of...