Qwen3.5 397B A17B is $4.61 cheaper per 1M input tokens (92.2% lower; 12.8x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Claude Opus Latest vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B for lower cost; pick Claude Opus Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
Pricing data updated:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B for lower cost; pick Claude Opus Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.5 397B A17B is estimated at $1.56 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus Latest, saving $15.94 (91.1% lower).
Cost-first pickQwen3.5 397B A17B
Context-first pickClaude Opus Latest
Sample savings$15.9491.1%
10x traffic gap$159.4
Claude Opus Latest has more context, but Qwen3.5 397B A17B saves $15.94 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $159.4. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Qwen3.5 397B A17B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Claude Opus Latest | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Qwen3.5 397B A17B | $37.5 | $3.12 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Qwen3.5 397B A17B | $30 | $2.73 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Qwen3.5 397B A17B | $130 | $12.09 |
Qwen3.5 397B A17B is $22.66 cheaper per 1M output tokens (90.6% lower; 10.7x difference).
Claude Opus Latest has 737.86K more context (3.81x larger).
Qwen3.5 397B A17B is $15.94 cheaper on the standard workload (91.1% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Qwen3.5 397B A17B has the lower input price; Qwen3.5 397B A17B has the lower output price; Claude Opus Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Qwen3.5 397B A17B is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $17.5 for Claude Opus Latest and $1.56 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B.
Choose Claude Opus Latest when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Qwen3.5 397B A17B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.5 397B A17B is estimated at $1.56 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus Latest, saving $15.94 (91.1% lower).
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B is $15.94 cheaper on the standard workload (91.1% lower).
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B is $4.61 cheaper per 1M input tokens (92.2% lower; 12.8x difference).
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B is $22.66 cheaper per 1M output tokens (90.6% lower; 10.7x difference).
- Claude Opus Latest has 737.86K more context (3.81x larger).
| Feature | Claude Opus Latest (Anthropic) | Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $5 | $0.39 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $25 | $2.34 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $17.5 | $1.56 |
| Context Window | 1M | 262.14K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Qwen3.5 397B A17B | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.5 397B A17B is estimated at $1.56 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus Latest, saving $15.94 (91.1% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Qwen3.5 397B A17B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Qwen3.5 397B A17B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Claude Opus Latest | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Claude 3 Haiku can replace Claude Opus Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.88.
- Claude 3.5 Haiku can replace Claude Opus Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $2.8.
- Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest can replace Claude Opus Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.
- Claude Haiku 4.5 can replace Claude Opus Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- OpenAI GPT Latest offers 1.05M context with $20 sample workload cost.
- No popular competitor is currently available.
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsAnthropic catalog
Review all tracked Anthropic models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Anthropic modelsQwen catalog
Check other Qwen models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Qwen modelsThis model always redirects to the latest model in the Claude Opus family.
The Qwen3.5 series 397B-A17B native vision-language model is built on a hybrid architecture that integrates a linear attention mechanism with a sparse mixture-of-experts model, achieving higher inference efficiency. It delivers...