API cost decision in 10 seconds

Claude Opus Latest vs Gemma 4 31B

Pick Gemma 4 31B for lower cost; pick Claude Opus Latest only if the larger context window matters more.

Pricing data updated: 2026-05-26T11:08:00Z Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Gemma 4 31B for lower cost; pick Claude Opus Latest only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 4 31B is estimated at $0.3 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus Latest, saving $17.2 (98.3% lower).

Cost-first pickGemma 4 31B

Context-first pickClaude Opus Latest

Sample savings$17.298.3%

10x traffic gap$171.95

Claude Opus Latest has more context, but Gemma 4 31B saves $17.2 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $171.95. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Gemma 4 31B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shape	Token mix	Better pick	Claude Opus Latest	Gemma 4 31B
Input-heavy / RAG	5M input + 500K output	Gemma 4 31B	$37.5	$0.78
Balanced workload	1M input + 1M output	Gemma 4 31B	$30	$0.49
Output-heavy chatbot	1M input + 5M output	Gemma 4 31B	$130	$1.97

Cheaper input Gemma 4 31B $5 vs $0.12 / 1M

Gemma 4 31B is $4.88 cheaper per 1M input tokens (97.6% lower; 41.7x difference).

Cheaper output Gemma 4 31B $25 vs $0.37 / 1M

Gemma 4 31B is $24.63 cheaper per 1M output tokens (98.5% lower; 67.6x difference).

Larger context Claude Opus Latest 1M vs 262.14K

Claude Opus Latest has 737.86K more context (3.81x larger).

Sample workload Gemma 4 31B $17.5 vs $0.3

Gemma 4 31B is $17.2 cheaper on the standard workload (98.3% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.

Monthly input tokens Monthly output tokens

Claude Opus Latest Calculating… Estimated API cost

Gemma 4 31B Calculating… Estimated API cost

Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Gemma 4 31B has the lower input price; Gemma 4 31B has the lower output price; Claude Opus Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Gemma 4 31B is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $17.5 for Claude Opus Latest and $0.3 for Gemma 4 31B.

Best Fit

Choose Claude Opus Latest when you care most about larger context window.

Choose Gemma 4 31B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Decision Notes

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 4 31B is estimated at $0.3 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus Latest, saving $17.2 (98.3% lower).
Gemma 4 31B is $17.2 cheaper on the standard workload (98.3% lower).
Gemma 4 31B is $4.88 cheaper per 1M input tokens (97.6% lower; 41.7x difference).
Gemma 4 31B is $24.63 cheaper per 1M output tokens (98.5% lower; 67.6x difference).
Claude Opus Latest has 737.86K more context (3.81x larger).

Head-to-Head Specs

Feature	Claude Opus Latest (Anthropic)	Gemma 4 31B (Google)
Input Price prompt tokens per 1M	$5	$0.12
Completion Price per 1M tokens	$25	$0.37
Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output	$17.5	$0.3
Context Window	1M	262.14K
Release Date	2026-04-21	2026-04-02

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use case	Better pick	Why
Budget-constrained production	Gemma 4 31B	On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 4 31B is estimated at $0.3 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus Latest, saving $17.2 (98.3% lower).
High-volume input processing	Gemma 4 31B	Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbots	Gemma 4 31B	Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document work	Claude Opus Latest	A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps

Claude 3 Haiku can replace Claude Opus Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.88.
Claude 3.5 Haiku can replace Claude Opus Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $2.8.
Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest can replace Claude Opus Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.
Claude Haiku 4.5 can replace Claude Opus Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.

Larger context near this budget

Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
OpenAI GPT Latest offers 1.05M context with $20 sample workload cost.

Popular competitors

No popular competitor is currently available.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Anthropic catalog

Review all tracked Anthropic models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Anthropic models

Google catalog

Check other Google models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Google models

Claude Opus Latest

This model always redirects to the latest model in the Claude Opus family.

Gemma 4 31B

Gemma 4 31B Instruct is Google DeepMind's 30.7B dense multimodal model supporting text and image input with text output. Features a 256K token context window, configurable thinking/reasoning mode, native function...