Muse Spark 1.1 is $3.75 cheaper per 1M input tokens (75% lower; 4x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Muse Spark 1.1 is estimated at $3.38 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 5, saving $14.12 (80.7% lower).
Cost-first pickMuse Spark 1.1
Context-first pickMuse Spark 1.1
Sample savings$14.1280.7%
10x traffic gap$141.25
Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $141.25. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Muse Spark 1.1 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Claude Opus 5 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Muse Spark 1.1 | $37.5 | $8.38 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Muse Spark 1.1 | $30 | $5.5 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Muse Spark 1.1 | $130 | $22.5 |
Muse Spark 1.1 is $20.75 cheaper per 1M output tokens (83% lower; 5.88x difference).
Muse Spark 1.1 has 48.58K more context (1.05x larger).
Muse Spark 1.1 is $14.12 cheaper on the standard workload (80.7% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Muse Spark 1.1 has the lower input price; Muse Spark 1.1 has the lower output price; Muse Spark 1.1 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $17.5 for Claude Opus 5 and $3.38 for Muse Spark 1.1.
Choose Claude Opus 5 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
Choose Muse Spark 1.1 when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Muse Spark 1.1 is estimated at $3.38 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 5, saving $14.12 (80.7% lower).
- Muse Spark 1.1 is $14.12 cheaper on the standard workload (80.7% lower).
- Muse Spark 1.1 is $3.75 cheaper per 1M input tokens (75% lower; 4x difference).
- Muse Spark 1.1 is $20.75 cheaper per 1M output tokens (83% lower; 5.88x difference).
- Muse Spark 1.1 has 48.58K more context (1.05x larger).
| Feature | 🔥Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic) | Muse Spark 1.1 (Meta) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $5 | $1.25 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $25 | $4.25 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $17.5 | $3.38 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #9 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Muse Spark 1.1 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Muse Spark 1.1 is estimated at $3.38 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 5, saving $14.12 (80.7% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Muse Spark 1.1 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Muse Spark 1.1 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Muse Spark 1.1 | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Claude 3 Haiku can replace Claude Opus 5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.88.
- Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) can replace Claude Opus 5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.75.
- Claude 3.5 Haiku can replace Claude Opus 5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $2.8.
- Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) can replace Claude Opus 5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.17 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.11 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #1
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #2
- Hy3 · Tencent · #3
- Ox Alpha · stealth · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsAnthropic catalog
Review all tracked Anthropic models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Anthropic modelsMeta catalog
Check other Meta models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Meta modelsClaude Opus 5 is Anthropic’s flagship model for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work. It is particularly strong at end-to-end software tasks, code review and bug finding, visual analysis...
Muse Spark 1.1 is a multimodal reasoning model from Meta, built for agentic tasks. It accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents and returns text, with a 1M-token context...