Aion-3.0-Mini is $3.3 cheaper per 1M input tokens (82.5% lower; 5.71x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewClaude Opus 5.5 vs Aion-3.0-Mini
Pick Aion-3.0-Mini when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Aion-3.0-Mini when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Aion-3.0-Mini is estimated at $1.4 vs $14 for Claude Opus 5.5, saving $12.6 (90% lower).
Cost-first pickAion-3.0-Mini
Context-first pickAion-3.0-Mini
Sample savings$12.690%
10x traffic gap$126
Aion-3.0-Mini is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $126. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Aion-3.0-Mini stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Claude Opus 5.5 | Aion-3.0-Mini |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Aion-3.0-Mini | $30 | $4.2 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Aion-3.0-Mini | $24 | $2.1 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Aion-3.0-Mini | $104 | $7.7 |
Aion-3.0-Mini is $18.6 cheaper per 1M output tokens (93% lower; 14.3x difference).
Aion-3.0-Mini has 48.58K more context (1.05x larger).
Aion-3.0-Mini is $12.6 cheaper on the standard workload (90% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Aion-3.0-Mini has the lower input price; Aion-3.0-Mini has the lower output price; Aion-3.0-Mini offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Aion-3.0-Mini is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $14 for Claude Opus 5.5 and $1.4 for Aion-3.0-Mini.
Choose Claude Opus 5.5 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
Choose Aion-3.0-Mini when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Aion-3.0-Mini is estimated at $1.4 vs $14 for Claude Opus 5.5, saving $12.6 (90% lower).
- Aion-3.0-Mini is $12.6 cheaper on the standard workload (90% lower).
- Aion-3.0-Mini is $3.3 cheaper per 1M input tokens (82.5% lower; 5.71x difference).
- Aion-3.0-Mini is $18.6 cheaper per 1M output tokens (93% lower; 14.3x difference).
- Aion-3.0-Mini has 48.58K more context (1.05x larger).
| Feature | NewClaude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) | Aion-3.0-Mini (AionLabs) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $4 | $0.7 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $20 | $1.4 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $14 | $1.4 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Aion-3.0-Mini | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Aion-3.0-Mini is estimated at $1.4 vs $14 for Claude Opus 5.5, saving $12.6 (90% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Aion-3.0-Mini | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Aion-3.0-Mini | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Aion-3.0-Mini | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Claude 3 Haiku can replace Claude Opus 5.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.88.
- Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) can replace Claude Opus 5.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.75.
- Claude 3.5 Haiku can replace Claude Opus 5.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $2.8.
- Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) can replace Claude Opus 5.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- GLM 5.3 Flash offers 1.31M context with $0.4 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.36 sample workload cost.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro · Xiaomi · #1
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) · Qwen · #2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #3
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsAnthropic catalog
Review all tracked Anthropic models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Anthropic modelsAionLabs catalog
Check other AionLabs models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open AionLabs modelsClaude Opus 5.5 is Anthropic's flagship model for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work, succeeding Claude Opus 5. It is particularly strong at multi-step changes in large codebases, code...
Aion-3.0 Mini is a multi-model roleplaying and storytelling system from AionLabs, built on the DeepSeek family of models. It uses a collaborative generation process in which multiple specialized models each...