API cost decision in 10 seconds

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) vs GPT-5.4 Image 2

Pick Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) when budget and context both matter.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) when budget and context both matter.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) is estimated at $8.75 vs $15.5 for GPT-5.4 Image 2, saving $6.75 (43.5% lower).

Cost-first pickClaude Opus 4.8 (batch)
Context-first pickClaude Opus 4.8 (batch)
Sample savings$6.7543.5%
10x traffic gap$67.5

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $67.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickClaude Opus 4.8 (batch)GPT-5.4 Image 2
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputClaude Opus 4.8 (batch)$18.75$47.5
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputClaude Opus 4.8 (batch)$15$23
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputClaude Opus 4.8 (batch)$65$83
Cheaper input Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) $2.5 vs $8 / 1M

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) is $5.5 cheaper per 1M input tokens (68.8% lower; 3.2x difference).

Cheaper output Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) $12.5 vs $15 / 1M

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) is $2.5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).

Larger context Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) 1M vs 272K

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) has 728K more context (3.68x larger).

Sample workload Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) $8.75 vs $15.5

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) is $6.75 cheaper on the standard workload (43.5% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) Calculating… Estimated API cost
GPT-5.4 Image 2 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) has the lower input price; Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) has the lower output price; Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $8.75 for Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) and $15.5 for GPT-5.4 Image 2.

Best Fit

Choose Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.

Choose GPT-5.4 Image 2 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) is estimated at $8.75 vs $15.5 for GPT-5.4 Image 2, saving $6.75 (43.5% lower).
  • Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) is $6.75 cheaper on the standard workload (43.5% lower).
  • Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) is $5.5 cheaper per 1M input tokens (68.8% lower; 3.2x difference).
  • Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) is $2.5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).
  • Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) has 728K more context (3.68x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureClaude Opus 4.8 (batch)
(Anthropic)
GPT-5.4 Image 2
(OpenAI)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$2.5$8
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$12.5$15
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$8.75$15.5
Context Window1M272K
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionClaude Opus 4.8 (batch)On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) is estimated at $8.75 vs $15.5 for GPT-5.4 Image 2, saving $6.75 (43.5% lower).
High-volume input processingClaude Opus 4.8 (batch)Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsClaude Opus 4.8 (batch)Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workClaude Opus 4.8 (batch)A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • Claude 3 Haiku can replace Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.88.
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) can replace Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.75.
  • Claude 3.5 Haiku can replace Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $2.8.
  • Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) can replace Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Anthropic catalog

Review all tracked Anthropic models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Anthropic models

OpenAI catalog

Check other OpenAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open OpenAI models
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)

Claude Opus 4.8 is Anthropic's most capable generally available model in the Opus family. It supports text, image, and file inputs with text output, with reasoning support and a 1M-token...

GPT-5.4 Image 2

[GPT-5.4](https://openrouter.ai/openai/gpt-5.4) Image 2 combines OpenAI's GPT-5.4 model with state-of-the-art image generation capabilities from GPT Image 2. It enables rich multimodal workflows, allowing users to seamlessly move between reasoning, coding, and...