API cost decision in 10 seconds

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Solar Pro 3

Pick Solar Pro 3 for lower cost; pick Claude Opus 4.7 only if the larger context window matters more.

Pricing data updated: 2026-05-26T11:08:00Z Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Solar Pro 3 for lower cost; pick Claude Opus 4.7 only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Solar Pro 3 is estimated at $0.45 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.7, saving $17.05 (97.4% lower).

Cost-first pickSolar Pro 3

Context-first pickClaude Opus 4.7

Sample savings$17.0597.4%

10x traffic gap$170.5

Claude Opus 4.7 has more context, but Solar Pro 3 saves $17.05 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $170.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Solar Pro 3 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shape	Token mix	Better pick	Claude Opus 4.7	Solar Pro 3
Input-heavy / RAG	5M input + 500K output	Solar Pro 3	$37.5	$1.05
Balanced workload	1M input + 1M output	Solar Pro 3	$30	$0.75
Output-heavy chatbot	1M input + 5M output	Solar Pro 3	$130	$3.15

Cheaper input Solar Pro 3 $5 vs $0.15 / 1M

Solar Pro 3 is $4.85 cheaper per 1M input tokens (97% lower; 33.3x difference).

Cheaper output Solar Pro 3 $25 vs $0.6 / 1M

Solar Pro 3 is $24.4 cheaper per 1M output tokens (97.6% lower; 41.7x difference).

Larger context Claude Opus 4.7 1M vs 128K

Claude Opus 4.7 has 872K more context (7.81x larger).

Sample workload Solar Pro 3 $17.5 vs $0.45

Solar Pro 3 is $17.05 cheaper on the standard workload (97.4% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.

Monthly input tokens Monthly output tokens

Claude Opus 4.7 Calculating… Estimated API cost

Solar Pro 3 Calculating… Estimated API cost

Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Solar Pro 3 has the lower input price; Solar Pro 3 has the lower output price; Claude Opus 4.7 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Solar Pro 3 is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.7 and $0.45 for Solar Pro 3.

Best Fit

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when you care most about larger context window.

Choose Solar Pro 3 when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Decision Notes

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Solar Pro 3 is estimated at $0.45 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.7, saving $17.05 (97.4% lower).
Solar Pro 3 is $17.05 cheaper on the standard workload (97.4% lower).
Solar Pro 3 is $4.85 cheaper per 1M input tokens (97% lower; 33.3x difference).
Solar Pro 3 is $24.4 cheaper per 1M output tokens (97.6% lower; 41.7x difference).
Claude Opus 4.7 has 872K more context (7.81x larger).

Head-to-Head Specs

Feature	Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic)	Solar Pro 3 (Upstage)
Input Price prompt tokens per 1M	$5	$0.15
Completion Price per 1M tokens	$25	$0.6
Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output	$17.5	$0.45
Context Window	1M	128K
Release Date	2026-04-16	2026-01-27

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use case	Better pick	Why
Budget-constrained production	Solar Pro 3	On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Solar Pro 3 is estimated at $0.45 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.7, saving $17.05 (97.4% lower).
High-volume input processing	Solar Pro 3	Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbots	Solar Pro 3	Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document work	Claude Opus 4.7	A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps

Claude 3 Haiku can replace Claude Opus 4.7 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.88.
Claude 3.5 Haiku can replace Claude Opus 4.7 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $2.8.
Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest can replace Claude Opus 4.7 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.
Claude Haiku 4.5 can replace Claude Opus 4.7 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.

Larger context near this budget

Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
OpenAI GPT Latest offers 1.05M context with $20 sample workload cost.

Popular competitors

No popular competitor is currently available.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Anthropic catalog

Review all tracked Anthropic models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Anthropic models

Upstage catalog

Check other Upstage models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Upstage models

Claude Opus 4.7

Opus 4.7 is the next generation of Anthropic's Opus family, built for long-running, asynchronous agents. Building on the coding and agentic strengths of Opus 4.6, it delivers stronger performance on...

Solar Pro 3

Solar Pro 3 is Upstage's powerful Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model. With 102B total parameters and 12B active parameters per forward pass, it delivers exceptional performance while maintaining computational efficiency. Optimized...