API cost decision in 10 seconds

🔥Claude Opus 4.7 vs NewGPT Chat Latest

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 when budget and context both matter.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 when budget and context both matter.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude Opus 4.7 is estimated at $17.5 vs $20 for GPT Chat Latest, saving $2.5 (12.5% lower).

Cost-first pickClaude Opus 4.7
Context-first pickClaude Opus 4.7
Sample savings$2.512.5%
10x traffic gap$25

Claude Opus 4.7 is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $25. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Claude Opus 4.7 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickClaude Opus 4.7GPT Chat Latest
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputClaude Opus 4.7$37.5$40
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputClaude Opus 4.7$30$35
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputClaude Opus 4.7$130$155
Cheaper input Tie $5 vs $5 / 1M

Both models report the same input price at $5 per 1M tokens.

Cheaper output Claude Opus 4.7 $25 vs $30 / 1M

Claude Opus 4.7 is $5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).

Larger context Claude Opus 4.7 1M vs 400K

Claude Opus 4.7 has 600K more context (2.5x larger).

Sample workload Claude Opus 4.7 $17.5 vs $20

Claude Opus 4.7 is $2.5 cheaper on the standard workload (12.5% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.7 Calculating… Estimated API cost
GPT Chat Latest Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

both models tie on input price; Claude Opus 4.7 has the lower output price; Claude Opus 4.7 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Claude Opus 4.7 is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.7 and $20 for GPT Chat Latest.

Best Fit

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.

Choose GPT Chat Latest when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude Opus 4.7 is estimated at $17.5 vs $20 for GPT Chat Latest, saving $2.5 (12.5% lower).
  • Claude Opus 4.7 is $2.5 cheaper on the standard workload (12.5% lower).
  • Both models report the same input price at $5 per 1M tokens.
  • Claude Opus 4.7 is $5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).
  • Claude Opus 4.7 has 600K more context (2.5x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
Feature🔥Claude Opus 4.7
(Anthropic)		NewGPT Chat Latest
(OpenAI)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M		$5$5
Completion Price
per 1M tokens		$25$30
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output		$17.5$20
Context Window1M400K
Release Date
Popularity#3

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionClaude Opus 4.7On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude Opus 4.7 is estimated at $17.5 vs $20 for GPT Chat Latest, saving $2.5 (12.5% lower).
High-volume input processingTieLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsClaude Opus 4.7Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workClaude Opus 4.7A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • Claude 3 Haiku can replace Claude Opus 4.7 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.88.
  • Claude 3.5 Haiku can replace Claude Opus 4.7 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $2.8.
  • Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest can replace Claude Opus 4.7 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 can replace Claude Opus 4.7 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.
Larger context near this budget
  • Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
  • Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
  • Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
  • GPT-5.5 offers 1.05M context with $20 sample workload cost.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Anthropic catalog

Review all tracked Anthropic models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Anthropic models

OpenAI catalog

Check other OpenAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open OpenAI models
Claude Opus 4.7

Opus 4.7 is the next generation of Anthropic's Opus family, built for long-running, asynchronous agents. Building on the coding and agentic strengths of Opus 4.6, it delivers stronger performance on...

GPT Chat Latest

GPT Chat Latest points to OpenAI's stable API alias `chat-latest` that always resolves to the latest Instant chat model used in ChatGPT. As OpenAI rolls out new Instant model updates...