Google Gemini Pro Latest is $3 cheaper per 1M input tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥Claude Opus 4.7 vs NewGoogle Gemini Pro Latest
Pick Google Gemini Pro Latest when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Google Gemini Pro Latest when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Google Gemini Pro Latest is estimated at $8 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.7, saving $9.5 (54.3% lower).
Cost-first pickGoogle Gemini Pro Latest
Context-first pickGoogle Gemini Pro Latest
Sample savings$9.554.3%
10x traffic gap$95
Google Gemini Pro Latest is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $95. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Google Gemini Pro Latest stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Claude Opus 4.7 | Google Gemini Pro Latest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Google Gemini Pro Latest | $37.5 | $16 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Google Gemini Pro Latest | $30 | $14 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Google Gemini Pro Latest | $130 | $62 |
Google Gemini Pro Latest is $13 cheaper per 1M output tokens (52% lower; 2.08x difference).
Google Gemini Pro Latest has 48.58K more context (1.05x larger).
Google Gemini Pro Latest is $9.5 cheaper on the standard workload (54.3% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Google Gemini Pro Latest has the lower input price; Google Gemini Pro Latest has the lower output price; Google Gemini Pro Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Google Gemini Pro Latest is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.7 and $8 for Google Gemini Pro Latest.
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
Choose Google Gemini Pro Latest when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Google Gemini Pro Latest is estimated at $8 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.7, saving $9.5 (54.3% lower).
- Google Gemini Pro Latest is $9.5 cheaper on the standard workload (54.3% lower).
- Google Gemini Pro Latest is $3 cheaper per 1M input tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).
- Google Gemini Pro Latest is $13 cheaper per 1M output tokens (52% lower; 2.08x difference).
- Google Gemini Pro Latest has 48.58K more context (1.05x larger).
| Feature | 🔥Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic) | NewGoogle Gemini Pro Latest (Google) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $5 | $2 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $25 | $12 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $17.5 | $8 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #3 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Google Gemini Pro Latest | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Google Gemini Pro Latest is estimated at $8 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.7, saving $9.5 (54.3% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Google Gemini Pro Latest | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Google Gemini Pro Latest | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Google Gemini Pro Latest | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Claude 3 Haiku can replace Claude Opus 4.7 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.88.
- Claude 3.5 Haiku can replace Claude Opus 4.7 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $2.8.
- Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest can replace Claude Opus 4.7 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.
- Claude Haiku 4.5 can replace Claude Opus 4.7 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- GPT-5.5 offers 1.05M context with $20 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
- Owl Alpha · OpenRouter · #5
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsAnthropic catalog
Review all tracked Anthropic models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Anthropic modelsGoogle catalog
Check other Google models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Google modelsOpus 4.7 is the next generation of Anthropic's Opus family, built for long-running, asynchronous agents. Building on the coding and agentic strengths of Opus 4.6, it delivers stronger performance on...
This model always redirects to the latest model in the Google Gemini Pro family.