API cost decision in 10 seconds

🔥Claude Opus 4.6 vs 🔥Nemotron 3 Super (free)

Pick Nemotron 3 Super (free) when budget is the priority.

Pricing data updated:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Nemotron 3 Super (free) when budget is the priority.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3 Super (free) is estimated at $0 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.6, saving $17.5 (100% lower).

Cost-first pickNemotron 3 Super (free)
Context-first pickBoth models
Sample savings$17.5100%
10x traffic gap$175

The reported context window is tied, so cost and provider fit carry more weight. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $175. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cheaper input Nemotron 3 Super (free) $5 vs $0 / 1M

Nemotron 3 Super (free) is free for input tokens while Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5 per 1M tokens.

Cheaper output Nemotron 3 Super (free) $25 vs $0 / 1M

Nemotron 3 Super (free) is free for output tokens while Claude Opus 4.6 costs $25 per 1M tokens.

Larger context Tie 1M vs 1M

Both models report the same context window at 1M tokens.

Sample workload Nemotron 3 Super (free) $17.5 vs $0

Nemotron 3 Super (free) is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $17.5.

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Nemotron 3 Super (free) Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Nemotron 3 Super (free) has the lower input price; Nemotron 3 Super (free) has the lower output price; both models report the same context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Nemotron 3 Super (free) is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.6 and $0 for Nemotron 3 Super (free).

Best Fit

Choose Claude Opus 4.6 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.

Choose Nemotron 3 Super (free) when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3 Super (free) is estimated at $0 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.6, saving $17.5 (100% lower).
  • Nemotron 3 Super (free) is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $17.5.
  • Nemotron 3 Super (free) is free for input tokens while Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5 per 1M tokens.
  • Nemotron 3 Super (free) is free for output tokens while Claude Opus 4.6 costs $25 per 1M tokens.
  • Both models report the same context window at 1M tokens.
Head-to-Head Specs
Feature🔥Claude Opus 4.6
(Anthropic)
🔥Nemotron 3 Super (free)
(NVIDIA)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$5$0
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$25$0
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$17.5$0
Context Window1M1M
Release Date
Popularity Rank
current rank
#11#14

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionNemotron 3 Super (free)On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3 Super (free) is estimated at $0 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.6, saving $17.5 (100% lower).
High-volume input processingNemotron 3 Super (free)Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsNemotron 3 Super (free)Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workTieA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • Claude 3 Haiku can replace Claude Opus 4.6 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.88.
  • Claude 3.5 Haiku can replace Claude Opus 4.6 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $2.8.
  • Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest can replace Claude Opus 4.6 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 can replace Claude Opus 4.6 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $3.5.
Larger context near this budget
  • Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
  • Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
  • Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
  • GPT-5.5 offers 1.05M context with $20 sample workload cost.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models ranked by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Anthropic catalog

Review all tracked Anthropic models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Anthropic models

NVIDIA catalog

Check other NVIDIA models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open NVIDIA models
Claude Opus 4.6

Opus 4.6 is Anthropic’s strongest model for coding and long-running professional tasks. It is built for agents that operate across entire workflows rather than single prompts, making it especially effective...

Nemotron 3 Super (free)

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super is a 120B-parameter open hybrid MoE model, activating just 12B parameters for maximum compute efficiency and accuracy in complex multi-agent applications. Built on a hybrid Mamba-Transformer...