API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewAnthropic Claude Haiku Latest vs GLM 4.6V

Pick GLM 4.6V for lower cost; pick Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick GLM 4.6V for lower cost; pick Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 4.6V is estimated at $0.75 vs $3.5 for Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest, saving $2.75 (78.6% lower).

Cost-first pickGLM 4.6V
Context-first pickAnthropic Claude Haiku Latest
Sample savings$2.7578.6%
10x traffic gap$27.5

Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest has more context, but GLM 4.6V saves $2.75 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $27.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

GLM 4.6V stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickAnthropic Claude Haiku LatestGLM 4.6V
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputGLM 4.6V$7.5$1.95
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputGLM 4.6V$6$1.2
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputGLM 4.6V$26$4.8
Cheaper input GLM 4.6V $1 vs $0.3 / 1M

GLM 4.6V is $0.7 cheaper per 1M input tokens (70% lower; 3.33x difference).

Cheaper output GLM 4.6V $5 vs $0.9 / 1M

GLM 4.6V is $4.1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (82% lower; 5.56x difference).

Larger context Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest 200K vs 131.07K

Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest has 68.93K more context (1.53x larger).

Sample workload GLM 4.6V $3.5 vs $0.75

GLM 4.6V is $2.75 cheaper on the standard workload (78.6% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest Calculating… Estimated API cost
GLM 4.6V Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

GLM 4.6V has the lower input price; GLM 4.6V has the lower output price; Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GLM 4.6V is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $3.5 for Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest and $0.75 for GLM 4.6V.

Best Fit

Choose Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest when you care most about larger context window.

Choose GLM 4.6V when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 4.6V is estimated at $0.75 vs $3.5 for Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest, saving $2.75 (78.6% lower).
  • GLM 4.6V is $2.75 cheaper on the standard workload (78.6% lower).
  • GLM 4.6V is $0.7 cheaper per 1M input tokens (70% lower; 3.33x difference).
  • GLM 4.6V is $4.1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (82% lower; 5.56x difference).
  • Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest has 68.93K more context (1.53x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureNewAnthropic Claude Haiku Latest
(Anthropic)		GLM 4.6V
(Z.ai)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M		$1$0.3
Completion Price
per 1M tokens		$5$0.9
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output		$3.5$0.75
Context Window200K131.07K
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionGLM 4.6VOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 4.6V is estimated at $0.75 vs $3.5 for Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest, saving $2.75 (78.6% lower).
High-volume input processingGLM 4.6VLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsGLM 4.6VLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workAnthropic Claude Haiku LatestA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • Claude 3 Haiku can replace Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.88.
  • Claude 3.5 Haiku can replace Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $2.8.
  • GLM 4.5 Air (free) can replace GLM 4.6V when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • GLM 4 32B can replace GLM 4.6V when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
Larger context near this budget
  • Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
  • Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
  • Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Anthropic catalog

Review all tracked Anthropic models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Anthropic models

Z.ai catalog

Check other Z.ai models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Z.ai models
Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest

This model always redirects to the latest model in the Anthropic Claude Haiku family.

GLM 4.6V

GLM-4.6V is a large multimodal model designed for high-fidelity visual understanding and long-context reasoning across images, documents, and mixed media. It supports up to 128K tokens, processes complex page layouts...