API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewClaude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 for lower cost; pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 for lower cost; pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude Haiku 5.5 is estimated at $0.35 vs $0.54 for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, saving $0.19 (35.1% lower).

Cost-first pickClaude Haiku 5.5
Context-first pickDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Sample savings$0.1935.1%
10x traffic gap$1.89

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has more context, but Claude Haiku 5.5 saves $0.19 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $1.89. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Claude Haiku 5.5 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputClaude Haiku 5.5$0.75$1.4
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputClaude Haiku 5.5$0.6$0.86
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputClaude Haiku 5.5$2.6$3.45
Cheaper input Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.1 vs $0.2156 / 1M

Claude Haiku 5.5 is $0.12 cheaper per 1M input tokens (53.6% lower; 2.16x difference).

Cheaper output Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.5 vs $0.6468 / 1M

Claude Haiku 5.5 is $0.15 cheaper per 1M output tokens (22.7% lower; 1.29x difference).

Larger context DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 1M vs 1.05M

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has 48.58K more context (1.05x larger).

Sample workload Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.35 vs $0.54

Claude Haiku 5.5 is $0.19 cheaper on the standard workload (35.1% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Claude Haiku 5.5 Calculating… Estimated API cost
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Claude Haiku 5.5 has the lower input price; Claude Haiku 5.5 has the lower output price; DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.35 for Claude Haiku 5.5 and $0.54 for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp.

Best Fit

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp when you care most about larger context window.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude Haiku 5.5 is estimated at $0.35 vs $0.54 for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, saving $0.19 (35.1% lower).
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 is $0.19 cheaper on the standard workload (35.1% lower).
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 is $0.12 cheaper per 1M input tokens (53.6% lower; 2.16x difference).
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 is $0.15 cheaper per 1M output tokens (22.7% lower; 1.29x difference).
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has 48.58K more context (1.05x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureNewClaude Haiku 5.5
(Anthropic)
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
(DeepSeek)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$0.1$0.2156
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$0.5$0.6468
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$0.35$0.54
Context Window1M1.05M
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionClaude Haiku 5.5On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude Haiku 5.5 is estimated at $0.35 vs $0.54 for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, saving $0.19 (35.1% lower).
High-volume input processingClaude Haiku 5.5Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsClaude Haiku 5.5Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Larger context near this budget
  • Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.47 sample workload cost.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.28 sample workload cost.
  • GPT-6 Luna offers 1.05M context with $0.35 sample workload cost.
  • GPT-6 Luna Pro offers 1.05M context with $0.35 sample workload cost.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Anthropic catalog

Review all tracked Anthropic models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Anthropic models

DeepSeek catalog

Check other DeepSeek models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open DeepSeek models
Claude Haiku 5.5

Claude Haiku 5.5 is Anthropic's small, fast model for high-volume, cost-sensitive work such as summarization, subagents, and browser use. It succeeds Claude Haiku 4.5 with stronger coding, computer use, and...

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is an experimental vision-enabled version of [DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731](https://openrouter.ai/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731) from DeepSeek, adding image understanding while matching the base model on text capabilities including agents,...