Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is $0.95 cheaper per 1M input tokens (95% lower; 20x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewClaude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs Inkling
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is estimated at $0.17 vs $3.02 for Inkling, saving $2.85 (94.2% lower).
Cost-first pickClaude Haiku 5.5 (batch)
Context-first pickClaude Haiku 5.5 (batch)
Sample savings$2.8594.2%
10x traffic gap$28.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $28.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) | Inkling |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) | $0.38 | $7.03 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) | $0.3 | $5.05 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) | $1.3 | $21.25 |
Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is $3.8 cheaper per 1M output tokens (93.8% lower; 16.2x difference).
Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) has 475.71K more context (1.91x larger).
Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is $2.85 cheaper on the standard workload (94.2% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) has the lower input price; Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) has the lower output price; Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.17 for Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) and $3.02 for Inkling.
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Inkling when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is estimated at $0.17 vs $3.02 for Inkling, saving $2.85 (94.2% lower).
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is $2.85 cheaper on the standard workload (94.2% lower).
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is $0.95 cheaper per 1M input tokens (95% lower; 20x difference).
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is $3.8 cheaper per 1M output tokens (93.8% lower; 16.2x difference).
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) has 475.71K more context (1.91x larger).
| Feature | NewClaude Haiku 5.5 (batch) (Anthropic) | Inkling (Thinking Machines) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.05 | $1 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.25 | $4.05 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.17 | $3.02 |
| Context Window | 1M | 524.29K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is estimated at $0.17 vs $3.02 for Inkling, saving $2.85 (94.2% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Inkling Small (free) can replace Inkling when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Inkling (free) can replace Inkling when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Inkling Small can replace Inkling when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.05.
- Inkling Small (batch) can replace Inkling when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.1.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.47 sample workload cost.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.28 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Step 5 Preview · StepFun · #2
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #3
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash · Xiaomi · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsAnthropic catalog
Review all tracked Anthropic models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Anthropic modelsThinking Machines catalog
Check other Thinking Machines models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Thinking Machines modelsClaude Haiku 5.5 is Anthropic's small, fast model for high-volume, cost-sensitive work such as summarization, subagents, and browser use. It succeeds Claude Haiku 4.5 with stronger coding, computer use, and...
Inkling is an open-weight multimodal mixture-of-experts model from Thinking Machines Lab, with 41B active parameters out of 975B total. It is designed for general-purpose reasoning, coding, agentic and tool-use systems,...